Material for the GEOframe Winter School - Opinions on (hydrological) modelling

At the end day of the school there is the place for some opinions o modelling. These were expressed many other times in different posts but collected here in three different parts.

• Simplifying (and viceversa) Hydrological model physics  - YouTube video I part and part II
• How can we make models more physically based - YouTube video 
• Another Post on the same topic
• Which is the best hydrological model ? YouTube video
• Same topic,  another post, and a second post

Some references

• Addor, N., & Melsen, L. (2018). Legacy, rather than adequacy, drive the selection of hydrological models. Water Resources Res., 1–34. http://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022958
• Kirchner, J. W. (2006). Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology. Water Resources Research, 42(3), 1–5. http://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004362
• Klemeš, V. (1986). Dilettantism in Hydrology: Transition or Destiny ? Water Resources Research, 22(9), 177S–188S.
• Savenije, H. H. G., & Hrachowitz, M. (2017). HESS Opinions: Catchments as meta-organisms - a new blue print for hydrological modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(2), 1107–1116. http://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1107-2017

Previous Winter School page

All Winter School pages

Next Winter School page